|
Papers
Non CSPP library
PDF: When Mercury Fears Harm
those fueling alarm about mercury should be held accountable for the costs and human toll they’re inflicting
PDF: Mercury, Climate and the Food Web: A Critical Review of Claims and Assumptions in Booth and Zeller (2005)
PDF: Doing Harm - The Mercury Scare
PDF:
Mercury science findings in People of the State of California vs. Tri-Union Seafoods.
Superior Court Judge finds MeHg levels in ocean fish “virtually
natural in origin,” and mercury alarm scientists have
“credibility problems.” Finds study underlying EPA’s
mercury RfD confounded, unreliable and without “statistically
significant relationship.”
PDF:
Reply
to Senator Collins on Reducing Harmful Mercury
PDF:
Making
Sense of State Fish Advisories
A guide for State legislators toward a better understanding
of mercury, fish and public health.
PDF: "Fish, Mercury and Cardiac Health: A Review of the Current Literature"
Does the trace amount of mercury in fish overwhelm its nutritional benefits for heart health?
PDF: EPA NODA Comments
EPA's foundational premise for regulatory action relative to mercury and power plants is scientifically unproven.
PDF: How Safe Are We From the Fish We Eat?
There is no sound scientific evidence to suggest
that the American public had been exposed to harmful levels of mercury
through fish consumption.
PDF: One-sheet summary of some essential mercury facts.
PDF: Comments to EPA on Mercury Rule
There is no clear scientific basis to conclude that utility powerplant mercury emissions endanger public health.
PDF: Misuse of Rainwater Mercury Data in National Wildlife Federation's Cycle of Harm Report
The National Wildlife Federation appears to have misinterpreted and misused scientific data in their "Cycle of Harm" report.
PDF: Analysis of Sierra Club's Alarmist Claims about Health Impacts of Mercury
It is the science-challenged alarmists who are endangering the health of America's and the world's children.
PDF: WHITE PAPER: EPA Mercury MACT Rulemaking not Justified by Science
There appears to be no scientific basis to
conclude that utility power plant emissions of elemental mercury are
significant or endanger the public health upon grounds of emissions
sources, transport and deposition patterns, or toxicity and
epidemiological studies.
PDF: Science Hill Watch
A Jan 29 seminar for Congressional staff on climate science and mercury distorts the facts and exaggerates consequences.
|
