Abdul El-Sayed endangers America’s Constitution and Inalienable Rights
Dr. Miklos K. Radvanyi
As Tuesday, November 3, 2026, approaches one gains the unmitigated impression that some of the Democrat(ic) Party’s candidates are playing dirty politics with people’s lives, their livelihood, and the long-term security of the United States of America. Among those candidates Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan stands out with his Taqiyya-like concealment of his true political beliefs. Taking to heart the Quranic admonitions against trusting the “Unbelievers,” Abdul El-Sayed outwardly often obscures his real intentions without becoming an “Unbeliever” himself inwardly. While this escapist “Jonahisation” of the Democrat(ic) Party has begun with the election of William J. Clinton, its full bloom has occurred under the eight years of Barack H. Obama’s presidency. Unlike the biblical Jonah who symbolizes the struggle between human fallibility and God’s demand to show mercy even to those whom others regard as enemies, President Obama became the embodiment of utopian “hope” and “change” by all the hate-filled anti-American political destructionists in the Democrat(ic) Party. Sold in 2008 as a victim of dishonest, exploitative society and a man with some intellectual pedigree, his election strategy was designed to capture the alleged sufferings of every minority and the lower middle classes. This part of his strategy asserted that the 2007-2008-style financial collapse was caused by the inherent deficiencies of the political and economic systems, and accused his predecessor George W. Bush, the U.S. Congress, and Wall Street’s “fat cats” of violating their own laws in order to destroy the voiceless victims of their greed. The other half of his strategy consisted of shameful promises, unrealistic predictions, and outright lies. His memoir titled A Promised Land demonstrates his stunning hypocrisy and professional incompetence. His self-examination is nothing but self-glorification. His promised political transformation – not unlike the collapse of the Soviet Union and all the lesser “Communist Dictatorships” – turned into a hypocritically tragic joke. His outrageously anti-American foreign policy laid bare his irrational amateurism and his total absence of any real knowledge about the world. More destructively, the memoir’s central weakness is selective accountability. By inviting the reader to appreciate his predicament of governing difficulties, he is numb about the difficulties he himself created by his own outlandish promises, unworkable priorities, and bizarre assumptions.
Although the conventional wisdom claims that history rarely repeats itself exactly, the candidacy of the Democrat Abdul El-Sayed with his ambition to fill the vacated seat of Senator Gary Peters gives the lie to this assertion. Beginning with his blatantly hateful and untrue statement that the State of Israel is a “rogue state” and continuing with labeling it “genocidal,” “apartheid,” and “colonialistic” political formation, his brainless acceptance of the cacophemistic diatribes of the self-righteous tyrannies across the globe speak for themselves. The people’s representatives in a liberal democracy can only legitimize the power that they are entrusted with by the voters when the former are honest individuals. An elected representative who intentionally misleads his constituency is a contradiction in a democracy, in which the principle of legitimacy is destroyed by its retrograde application. A principle that is destroyed by its application becomes a hoax, and no action can transform a hoax into a principle of legitimacy guaranteeing core honesty by the violator of peace and order. El-Sayed is guilty of inverting the trust that he demands from the voters. His declaration that the State of Israel is a rogue state is a lie. In international politics, a rogue state is a state whose government is accused of persistently threatening other countries and defying fundamental rules of international conduct. The State of Israel has never initiated wars. It only responded by defending itself from repeated Arab aggressions. The charge of “Genocide” in Gaza is equally a monstrous lie. Under Article II of the Genocide Convention, genocide means “any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial. Or religious group, as such.” Here, one rebuttal out of many should suffice. Yahya Sinwar was treated and cured of a brain tumor, while serving a life sentence in an Israeli prison. Compared with the terroristic barbarism of October 7, 2023, and the genocidal slogan “From the River To The Sea,” the question arises, which party is genocidal? The other charge of “Apartheid” is also laughable. This crime has a precise legal definition too. Under Article 7 of the Rome Statute, it means “inhumane acts…committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.” 21% of Israeli citizens are Arab. They vote, run for office,serve as judges, doctors, professors, and diplomats. Finally, settler colonialism definitely does not qualify as an overall classification of the State of Israel.
El-Sayed’s version of Obama’s vainglorious phrase “fundamentally transforming the United States of America” really means the total subversion of the existing liberal democratic order. Moreover, as the first Muslim who might be elected to the U.S. Senate, he wants to make a big difference that might propel him to become the first Muslim President of the United States of America. His attempt at uniting two already failed concepts – Marxism and Islamist extremism – is blatantly un-American and totally repugnant to the genius of the U.S. Constitution. His equivocal “revolution” from its start to finish is nothing else, but the sycophantic manifestation of the annihilative destruction of Western civilization with its Judeo-Christian foundation. From his heavily Muslim Michigan, El-Sayed wants to lethally weaken the United States of America and in the process to split up the whole constitutional system by simultaneously signing his and his party’s death warrant into the bargain.
The voters of Michigan and beyond must not bow to the perpetual lies of the Democrat(ic) Party. If they do, they will sign their and their progenies’ political, economic, and cultural death warrant in the long run. In this ruinous process, they will live a perpetual lie, in permanent opposition to the “revolutionary” decline, that will definitely be full of unfounded suspicions, extremely violent, and devilishly cruel. For this reason, it is becoming increasingly urgent to elect politicians who could creatively defend the founding principles of the U.S. Constitution. Throughout history, a ship without rudder or sails has always been absorbed by the waters. What is at stake in Michigan is the legitimacy of power. The fact that tyrannies have triumphed in two-thirds of the countries throughout the world and nearly annexed all the international organizations, has not made the required impression in the United States of America and in the European continent. The majority of the Americans are more attentive to the well-packaged lies than to the realities of the world. They must unite in the understanding that tyranny means death and annihilation for everyone in eternity.