×
↓ Freedom Centers

Blog

Frontiers of Freedom Action Super PAC TV Spot: Schumer’s Extremism & the Media’s Collusion

By JPM • Frontiers of Freedom

. . – . .

.-.-.-.-.

. . – . .

AMAC — PAC to Senate GOP: Attack Crooked Media and Schumer’s “Corrupt Bargain with Extremists”

. . – . .

An Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC) Exclusive by Seamus Brennan

. . – . .

In an upstate New York TV blitz alleging that the media is “the most powerful and corrupt institution in America” seeking to “smear” GOP candidates and protect their own “chosen candidates,” a conservative Super PAC is asking voters to “send a message to the media bosses” who are corrupting American journalism and give them a “miserable election night” bydefeating Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).

. . – . .

In addition to focusing on Schumer as President Joe Biden’s “chief enabler”—complete with news footage of various Biden foreign and domestic policy fiascos—the strikingly vivid two-minute spot features an image of the far-left Democraticrepresentatives known as the “Squad,” led by Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (D-NY), and charges: “Schumer made a corrupt bargain with left-wing extremists to not run a primary against him if he pushed far-left positions.”

. . – . .

The ad then lists Schumer’s close ties to radical groups that he has “never had to denounce,” which seek to “defund the police” and “destroy the New York City Police Department.” It also targets Schumer’s “dark money alliance with notorious anti-American billionaire George Soros, who funded all the lawless prosecutors like Alvin Bragg” (a controversial soft-on-crime New York City district attorney). It also ties Schumer to opposition to school reform and parental rights, as well as the destruction of women’s sports and childhood education with “gender lunacy.”

. . – . .

The ad, which launched on Thursday, August 25 on nightly news programs in the Buffalo, Rochester, and Syracuse markets,is set to run through next week.

. . – . .

“Our ad is a template for all Republican candidates because every single Senate Democrat—Mark Kelly(D-AZ), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Maggie Hassan(D-NH), and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NM)—agreed to vote with the far-left wing of the party so long as they didn’t have to face a primary,” said George Landrith, Chairman of Frontiers of Freedom Action(FFA),the group who ran the ad.

. . – . .

“Any one of them, as the 50th Senator, could have stopped the Biden agenda—but they didn’t, because they put the wishes of the far left above the wishes oftheir constituents. They essentially said, ‘Don’t primary me, and I will vote your way,’” Landrith said.

. . – . .

“Most people in these states still find it hard to believe these Senators became extremists,” Landrith continued,“but when you explain why they were so frightened of a well-financed primary challenge, they understand.”

. . – . .

“The corrupt media’s firestorm of attacks on Republican candidates is coming in the fall, and the only way to stop it is to get ahead of it,” Landrith said,a theme echoed by an ad released by Governor Ron DeSantis (R-FL) this week, which attracted attention for taking aim at the corruption of the corporate media.

. . – . .

The first minute of the New York ad focuses predominantly on the media for trying to “crush dissent” and hide corruption,after displaying headlines about media scandals and smears—including its handling of the China Virus leak, censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story, promotion of the Russian collusion hoax, coverup for Hillary Clinton’s email scandals, and refusal to report on Biden’s blackmailing of the Ukrainian government. The ad also lists other political smears, like those against General Michael Flynn, students at Covington Catholic High School, and parents protesting anti-Americanism in their local schools.

. . – . .

The FFA ad goes on to blame the media for electing Joe Biden “by letting him run “from his basement” and “covering up his incompetence and ill health.” The ad also deems him to be “the worst president in modern history,” and features videos of Biden falling up the stairs on Air Force One and taking directions from the Easter Bunny at a White House event with the headline “EASTER BUNNY RUNS WHITE HOUSE EVENT.”

. . – . .

The spot then quickly switches to a photo of Schumer as “Biden’s chief enabler” and shows footage of a gleeful Biden and Schumer at a White House signing event for legislation that the GOP and most economistssay will drive inflation higher.

. . – . .

“First, you have the networks and newspapers. Second, you have the left-wing extremists like Chuck Schumer who run the Democratic Party. We are saying they are one and the same entity,” Landrith charged.

. . – . .

“Our ad changes the false media narrative from the supposed imperfections of GOP candidates to the massive national disadvantage of Democrats. Every single Senate Democrat is imperiled by their Biden identification, and especially by their corrupt bargain with the leftists that have taken over their party,” Landrith said.

. . – . .

Landrith is also optimistic that by focusing on the media’s deliberate one-sidedness—from its partisan coverage of this month’s Mar-a-Lago raid to itshabitual protection of Democratic candidates and politicians—the ad could elicit turnout from moderate or independent voters concerned with media corruption and the radicalism of Schumer’s agenda. “It’s very important to control the word ‘extremist,’” he said.

. . – . .

Additionally, the ad notes the Biden-Pelosi-Schumer attempt to push a radical takeover of elections—as well as efforts by other Democrats to alter the makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Senate, American citizenship, and the Electoral College—represents a“scorched-earth rule-or-ruin” attack on longstanding American democratic institutions.

. . – . .

“The GOP has never gotten across to the people how those bills would have destroyed the secret ballot, putDepartment of Justice bureaucrats in charge of our elections, abolished citizenship rights, packed the Supreme Court into irrelevance, radically changed the U.S. Senate, and made a few states the only thing that mattered in presidential elections by abolishing the Electoral College,” said Landrith.

. . – . .

The spot’s release comes nearly two months ahead of the November 8 midterm elections, as Democrats amp up their fight to retain their control of Congress. Though Schumer himself at the moment is not regarded as politically vulnerable going into the fall midterms, FFA notes that some segments of the New York population—particularly upstate New York—might be receptive to attacks on Schumer’s startling record of radicalism. Just as ad campaigns in last fall’s New Jersey gubernatorial race (another deep-blue state) yielded far closer results than initially anticipated, FFA hopes that it can help to replicate the close matchup with this week’s spot.

. . – . .

“New Jersey could have a GOP Governor today if the D.C. establishment wasn’t so cautious,” Landrithstated. “Republicans need to stop playing defense and expand the Senate map.”

. . – . .

As Election Day draws closer and Democrats continue to accelerate their attacks against Republican candidates, FFA’s ad could help to expose Schumer’s radical agenda in a way the mainstream media has failed to do. And should it succeed, FFA’s strategy could prove instrumental in holding Schumer and other far-left politicians across the nation accountable for the first time in recent memory.

. . – . .

READ THE ORIGINAL AMAC EXCLUSIVE ARTICLE BY SEAMUS BRENNAN <<HERE>>

. . – . .

. . – . .

Frontiers of Freedom Action Press Release: Frontiers of Freedom Super PAC TV Spot says: “Defeat Liberal Extremist Chuck Schumer” Because “Media Is the 2022 Issue.”

. . – . .

August 25, WASHINGTON, DC – Asking New Yorkers to “send a message to the media bosses, to the networks and newspapers that are the most corrupt institutions in America” by defeating “their chosen candidate,” FRONTIERS OF FREEDOM ACTION, a Super PAC, has launched an upstate New York TV media blitz against U.S. Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY).

…\ . . .- – 

The 120 second TV spot is playing in New York‘s four major upstate media markets (Buffalo, Syracuse and Rochester ) starting Thursday and continuing through Wednesday of next week. The ad features news headlines that its sponsors say backs up the allegations.

…\ . . .- – 

“Every single allegation is backed up with on-screen news stories and headlines. We also have a fact sheet on our website,” said the group’s chairman George Landrith. “We cite specifics about why for the media bosses Schumer is their chosen candidate.”

…\ . . .- – 

MAJOR UPSTATE PUSH: 2-MINUTE SPOT ON BUFFALO, SYRACUSE, ROCHESTER NIGHTLY NEWS 

…\ . . .- – 

Quotes from George Landrith:

.-.-.-.

“THE CORRUPT MEDIA’S FIRESTORM OF ATTACKS ON REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES IS COMING IN THE FALL AND THE ONLY WAY TO STOP IT IS TO GET AHEAD OF IT.”

…\ . . .- – 

“THIS CHANGES THE MEDIA NARRATIVE FROM IMPERFECTIONS OF GOP CANDIDATES TO THE MASSIVE NATIONAL DISADVANTAGE OF DEMOCRATS BECAUSE OF THEIR FAR-LEFT LURCH AND AGENDA.”

…\ . . .- – 

 -EVERY SENATE DEMOCRAT IS IMPERILED BY THEIR BIDEN IDENTIFICATION AND THEIR CORRUPT BARGAIN WITH THE LEFTIST EXTREMISTS THAT HAVE TAKEN OVER THEIR PARTY —- “DON’T PRIMARY ME AND I WILL VOTE YOUR WAY”

…\ . . .- – 

  “– FIRST, YOU HAVE THE NETWORKS AND NEWSPAPERS. SECOND YOU HAVE THE LEFT-WING EXTREMISTS LIKE CHUCK SCHUMER WHO RUN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. WE ARE SAYING THEY ARE ONE AND THE SAME ENTITY,” says super PAC Chairman

…\ . . .- – 

THE AD SAYS SCHUMER is

“MEDIA’S CHOSEN CANDIDATE”

“BIDEN’S CHIEF ENABLER” 

“MADE CORRUPT BARGAIN” WITH PROGESSIVE LEFT TO NOT TO RUN A PRIMARY AGAINST HIM

…\ . . .- – 

“SCHUMER GETS FREE RIDE FROM MEDIA” SO NEVER HAS TO DENOUNCE EXTREMISTS WHO WANT TO DEFUND THE POLICE, DESTROY NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT AND SUPPORT SOFT-ON-CRIME PROSECUTORS.

…\ . . .- – 

“The media is always demanding GOP denounce extremists but will never hold Democrats like Schumer to that standard.”  

…\ . . .- – 

CHUCK SCHUMER IS POSTER BOY FOR DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATES IN BLUE STATES WHO SOLD THEIR POLITICAL SOULS TO THE LEFT TO AVOID A PRIMARY-ESTABLISHMENT

…\ . . .- – 

BLUE STATE SENATORS COULDN’T RUN UNLESS THEY 

…\ . . .- – 

VOTED FOR BIDEN’S FAR LEFT AGENDA 

…\ . . .- – 

SCHUMER IS A GREAT BLUE STATE OPPORTUNITY FOR GOP

…\ . . .- – 

 “NEW JERSEY COULD HAVE A GOP REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR TODAY IF THE DC ESTABLISHMENT WASN’T SO CAUTIOUS”

…\ . . .- – 

TV Spot says MEDIA IS AMERICA’S MOST CORRUPT INSTITUTION COVERED UP 1) China virus leak, 2) Hunter Biden laptop scandal, 3) illegal wrongdoing by Clinton and Biden, 4) FBI harassment of political dissenters, 5) never apologized for two years of its Russian collusion hoax, 6) promoted smears and civil rights violations against conservatives, 7) phony impeachments and show trials, 8) covered up Biden’s ill health and incompetence by letting him run from basement.

…\ . . .- – 

SCHUMER AS BIDEN’s “CHIEF ENABLER” 

HUGE SPENDING BILLS CAUSING SHATTERING INFLATION AND RECESSION.

SHUT DOWN PIPELINES, DROVE UP GAS PRICES

CAUSED FOOD SHORTAGES EVEN BABY FORMULA

AND OPPOSING SCHOOL REFORM.

SCHUMER RECKLESSLY THREATENED BY NAME SUPREME COURT JUSTICE KAVANUGH

SUPPORTS POLITICIANS WHO VIOLATED THEIR OWN LOCKDOWNS ABD DESTROYING BUSINESSES (Pelosi, DeBlasio, Cuomo, Newsom)

DESTROY WOMEN’S SPORTS AND CHILDHOOD EDUCATION WITH GENDER LUNACY (Pictures of Lia the swimmer and drag queens at kindergarten)

HIS “SCORCHED-EARTH” “RULE-OR -RUIN” ATTACK ON AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS

WILL DESTROY – 

THE SUPREME COURT

THE SACRED SECRET BALLOT (No voter ID, unlimited vote harvesting and mail-ins & DC bureaucrats’ takeover of elections)

  CITIZENSHIP  (Open borders)

US SENATE  (Add new states, no filibuster

ELECTORAL COLLEGE   (Elections decided by a few counties in a few states)

IMPOSE ANTI-CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS TEST FOR FEDERAL OFFICE

…\ . . .- – 

SCHUMER AS “CHOSEN CANDIDATE OF LIBERAL MEDIA BOSSES” MEANS GOP CAN TAP INTO “PEOPLE’S FURY” AT THE MOST POWERFUL AND CORRUPT POLITICAL FORCE IN AMERICA–MEDIA BOSSES WHO ARE “COVERING UP TRUTH ABOUT THEIR CHOSEN CANDIDATES”

“NO LONGER REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS BUT MEDIA BOSSES VS. AMERICA.”

IDEOLOGUES AND POLITICAL HATERS

 MOST OF ALL, SEND A MESSAGE TO THE MEDIA BOSSES

TO THE NETWORKS AND NEWSPAPERS THAT ARE THE MOST CORRUPT INSTITUTIONS IN AMERICA

THEY ARE THE OPPOSITION PARTY — THE 2022 ISSUE.

THEY WILL SMEAR ANY OPPONENT AND SHUT DOWN CAMPAIGN ADS (Conscience, Truth, Fair Play mean nothing)

THEY SEEK TO CRUSH DISSENT

SO GIVE THOSE WHO HAVE CORRUPTED JOURNALISM A MISERABLE ELECTION NIGHT

DEFEAT LIBERAL EXTREMIST CHUCK SCHUMER

MAKE THIS A WAVE ELECTION (“Nationalize” the election)

ELECT NO DEMS

NO LIBERAL EXTREMISTS

SEND A MESSAGE


Frontiers of Freedom Weekly Report – November 25, 2022


      

George Landrith, Dr. Joe Mangiacotti, and Tom Donelson discuss the leading issues of the week: (1) World Economic Forum Foundation Chair Klaus Schwab says China is a role model; (2) Dr. Fauci admits he’s a bureaucrat, not a scientist or even a physician; (3) Alaska’s Ranked Choice Voting helps losers win and turns representative democracy on its head; (4) the lame stream media lies once again about acts of violence and tries to pin hate crimes on conservatives — it turns out that the Colorado club shooter was not a Conservaitve and instead is a non-binary guy who uses they/them pronouns; (5) inflation is surging despite Biden’s claim that it is under control and he’s fixed the problem the vast majority of Americas have had to cut back for Thanksgiving and Christmas. And we will each have a “one more thing” story to discuss!


Frontiers of Freedom Weekly Report – Nov. 18, 2022

George Landrith, Dr. Joe Mangiacotti, Tom Donelson, and Dr. Larry Fedewa discuss the leading issues of the week: (1) the FTX cryptocurrency scandal that has Ukraine, Democrats and Sam Bankman-Fried at its epicenter. (2) the U.S. House of Representatives will flip and Nancy Pelosi will lose control of the gavel. It looks like Kevin McCarthy and Mitch McConnel will lead in the House and Senate respectively. (3) Russia’s war of conquest in Ukraine took an interesting turn — with missiles landing in Poland. What’s really going on?  And should the US continue to send pallets of cash to Ukraine or should we focus on actually helping them repel Putin’s forces? (4) What’s up with the Georgia run-off election? Will Biden’s automatic vote in incumbent Warnock win a full term to the US Senate or will Georgia decide it would like someone to represent Georgia — like Herschel Walker. And we will each have a “one more thing” story to discuss!


With Orbán, Against Orbán!

How Orbán’s Fundamental Law Can be Confronted with Orbán’s Authoritarianism

By János Palotás

It was indeed a unique solution proposed by the legal advisors who turned their backs on their profession and served the authoritarian rule of Orbán, that by abusing the two-thirds mandate, Orbán created the first dual (hybrid) Fundamental Law with the fourth amendment to the original Fundamental Law (March 25, 2013).  This amendment made it possible for the Fundamental Law to include both the fundamental values of the rule of law (a prerequisite for EU membership) and the indispensable autocratic powers granted to Orbán. Orbán then deprived the Constitutional Court of the right to examine the contents of the new amendments he proposed, to preserve the integrity of the Fundamental Law and its compatibility with human rights.

It is indicative of Orbán’s deliberate move that in the years to come, Orbán will repeatedly and without a second thought, take advantage of this opportunity. Orbán, in parallel with the enactment of laws satisfying his despotism, is also regularly adding amendments to the Fundamental Law that preclude their sustainability and even their amendability in the event of a change of power. Thus, Orbán’s legislation did not abolish the obstructive elements of the Fundamental Law, because upon its detection the EU would have immediately initiated proceedings against the Orbán Government, but it added new articles to the Fundamental Law, keeping the ones approved, as necessary for his nefarious purposes, knowing that the Constitutional Court cannot carry out a substantive examination.

Orbán therefore regularly invokes his right under a hybrid (dual) structure of the Fundamental Law. The real question is: why only Orbán? So why can’t we see that the clauses protecting our rights are still there today. Why don’t we, or even the European Union, make use of the legal options, most of which are still available in the Fundamental Law to protect the rule of law!

After Orbán’s landslide victory in the 3 April elections, he was confronted with the need to negotiate with the European Union to finance his authoritarian regime (I prefer to call it his criminal cabal). As a result, a number of Orbán’s laws are being amended by Parliament today. These amendments are considered by me to be unlikely to restore the rule of law, as I pointed out in a recent interview with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (one of the world’s most influential newspapers). The obvious thing would have been for the EU, and the opposition parties here at home, to demand that we join the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, that we change our electoral and media regulations so that voters can recognize and assert their own interests and vote again in a much more proportional system of electoral mandate allocation.   It should be upheld as an expectation that the Government should withdraw the amendments to the Fundamental Law, from the Fourth to the Eleventh, which, without exception, ensure the sustainability of Orbán’s authoritarianism.

It should be pointed out that within the dual Hungarian Fundamental Law, all of its authoritarian interventions are in conflict with EU law, which is an integral part of the Hungarian legal system. It is important to know that EU law takes precedence over national law. This is also true for proceedings before national courts, which unfortunately most courts do not seem to understand, and this seems to be the case for many chambers of the Curia.

Throughout my presentations, my conversations with friends, my writings, I have always maintained that laws do not take precedence over truth. Our rights and obligations are determined by social justice appropriate to the times, even if quite often, as in Hungary today, those who exercise power abuse the legislative process in an attempt to secure exclusive power for themselves, including thez exclusive right to decide on people’s rights and obligations.

It also follows from my understanding that, in my capacity as an expert, inquiries submitted to me which, after a preliminary review, lead me to the conclusion that my potential client is in the wrong are not accepted. My self-contained expert reasoning would then always hit an invisible wall, according to which the act under challenge violated not only the law, but also the rights of others. 

The situation is different when a first review of an inquiry or request makes it likely to me that the person seeking assistance needs to assert the truth against a particular piece of legislation. The person who approaches me in such cases usually complains of his helplessness and that he has been dismissed from countless qualified law firms and lawyers’ offices, saying that although the law should, according to the principle of justice, uphold his right, but “unfortunately this is often not the case”, and that the decisions of the courts are determined by the law and not by justice, and that there is nothing to be done. I am sad to say that I too have encountered this very common argument many times in my conversations with otherwise excellent lawyers and judges, and in assessing legal situations. But this is not the case!

I will try to illustrate the clarity of my understanding of the law with an example that is very relevant today, known and followed by readers of the “Szép Szó (A Beautiful Word)” addendum of Népszava.

  • On September 30, 2022, Beatrix Marosi, the head of the competent school district, in voluntary service of Orbán’s arrogant authority, personally delivered the immediate dismissal of five teachers to the Kölcsey Ferenc High School in Budapest on the grounds that they had participated in so-called civil disobedience.
  • The five teachers filed a class action suit, and on October 28, with the support of eminent lawyers from the Hungarian Helsinki Committee, they filed an employment action at the Metropolitan Court of Budapest. 

According to the statements of Dr. Balázs Tóth, the attorney of the international advocacy organization representing the teachers, the reception of the action in court cannot be predicted in advance, precisely because of its unprecedented nature, but more than ten arguments are presented in the action, which, in their opinion, justify the disproportionate assessment of the teachers’ actions in the sanctions applied.

Despite my infinite respect and appreciation, this legal argument would either be left out of my line of reasoning altogether, or at most would be included in my legal argument. In the petition, I would only ask for a ruling that the conduct of the teachers concerned was lawful and therefore did not give rise to any sanction.

Although the so-called Convention on Human Rights and Freedoms does not include the right to strike (the right to walkout) as a specific clause, it would be a mistake to conclude that the right to strike cannot be derived from its rules. Under Article 4 of the Convention,  for example no one can be required to perform compulsory labor. In other words, no teacher could be obliged to teach any class at any school for which he or she is not qualified or contracted. Namely, this violates the cited legal text as well as the rights of parents and children and the obligations of the State under Article 2 of the First Additional Protocol. In my professional opinion, it is also a violation of the Convention if a teacher receives instructions that violate the human rights of the child he or she is teaching or of the parent representing the child.

Article 9 of the Convention on freedom of conscience specifically states that everyone has the right to express his or her convictions, individually and collectively, in public and in education. The obligation to observe and uphold the rights and obligations contained in the Convention, both in the national legal system and in national court proceedings, is recurrent in the principal treaties of the Union.

Article XVII of the Fundamental Law provides for the right of workers to walkouts. According to paragraphs 2 and 3, all employees have the right to working conditions which respect their health, safety and dignity. One only has to wonder whether the central regulations that govern teachers’ daily lives today ensure their personal dignity. Whether their remuneration guarantees their livelihood and their health and safety, etc.

The right to walkouts in the Fundamental Law is nothing other than the right to freedom of expression under Article IX of the Fundamental Law and the protection of one’s legitimate interests under Article XXVIII of the Fundamental Law in the world of work.

Article I(2) of the Fundamental Law also states that it expects these rights to be enshrined in law. Paragraph 3 also requires the substantive elements of such laws to comply with the requirement that “A fundamental right may be restricted to the extent strictly necessary to ensure the exercise of another fundamental right or to protect a constitutional interest, in proportion to the aim pursued and with due regard for the essential substance of the fundamental right”.

When designing a tactical approach to litigation, it is crucial what we consider to be the starting point and from where we build up the process. We will arrive at a different conclusion if we accept as a starting point the Emergency Government Decree issued by Orbán on February 11, 2022, which is in force today, as the rules for teachers’ protests through a walkout, or if we reject it and take into account as a starting legal principle the Human Rights, the law of the European Union, and certain provisions of the Fundamental Law that give us rights when filing the petition for a legal action.

Orbán’s Decree is only in force until the legality of its substance is overturned. For in the case that I envisage, if at the end of a lengthy procedure it is established that Orbán’s restrictive decree is unlawful, i.e. null and void, because it has deprived civil disobedience participants of rights (for example, the right to express their opinions through a walkout) that they could not have been deprived of, then we can certainly no longer talk about the alleged infringement. But the same proportionality is expected of those involved in civil disobedience. So it is still open to scrutiny whether an announced absence from a class was a disproportionately broader expression of opinion by those affected than they would have had if they had been given the right to strike, had they not been unlawfully restricted by Orbán. I think that this is certainly not the case, so the voluntary expression of teachers’ opinions is lawful, and the sanctioning of them can be declared a serious infringement, even in the Hungarian courts, I think, but most definitely in the European Court of Justice.

The result and social significance of such a procedure goes far beyond the protection of the rights of five teachers to teach, which is of course a priority in itself. It is often argued that the legal work in the proceedings I consult on runs the risk that, due to gaps in national law, many claims cannot be directly assigned a legal rule, which would simplify the legal argument. But this should not scare us. Thousands of years of law, dating back to the 3rd century BC, can now give us a solid basis for never giving up on what is right. Nor is it an inescapable obstacle if national law does not explicitly enshrine the right of civil resistance and disobedience. These rights are existing even without the knowledge of the Minister of the Interior, and can be enforced by the long-known and often forgotten rules of analogy in courtrooms. If we learn to apply the law more comprehensively, we can also get legal answers on how to resist the traps of the legal environment created by Orbán’s continuous infringing legislation.

In September, the EU Parliament declared by a large majority, with my agreement, that Orbán’s regime has now become an authoritarian hybrid regime. However, the duality also means that the system does not only serve Orbán, but also retains the constitutional elements that can be used as a weapon against him.


Frontiers of Freedom Weekly Report – November 11, 2022

George Landrith, Dr. Joe Mangiacotti, Tom Donelson, and Dr. Larry Fedewa discuss the leading issues of the week: (1) the massive red wave didn’t quite materialize the way many thought it would, but it appears that the GOP will control the House and may also control the Senate — depending upon the outcomes of three seats — Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona. But why was the red wave not a big as expected?  (2) Election night was a good night for Florida Ron DeSantis — why was that?  (3) Some claim that Trump was a loser on election night despite the fact that he wasn’t on the ballot. While some of his endorsed candidates lost, some of the won too. So why is he being called a loser?  (4) What can we learn from New York where the GOP unseated some unexpected Democrats?  (5) What can we learn from Florida where the GOP did have an impressive red wave?  (6) With extremists like John Fetterman elected to the Senate, will the Democrats be able to moderate? Or will they continue to be the socialist party and the party of extremism?  (7) How can Biden hope to moderate and work with Republicans when he spent the last six months fomenting violence against conservatives and calling them fascists and existential threats to our republic. And we will each have a “one more thing” story to discuss!

     

       


Frontiers of Freedom Weekly Report – Nov. 4, 2022

     

George Landrith, Dr. Joe Mangiacotti, Tom Donelson, and Dr. Larry Fedewa discuss the leading issues of the week: (i) should we be allowing China to buy American high tech chip companies? (ii) Joe Biden gave his second incendiary campaign speech masquerading as a presidential address. What the heck is going on? (iii) Joe Biden has been caught telling obvious lies — in many cases repeatedly. Is he a pathological or compulsive liar? (iv) What are the midterm elections looking like? How many seats do the Republicans win in the House? And can they win the majority in the Senate? And what are the issues driving this election? (v) The Left is demanding a COVID “amnesty” in an attempt to avoid accountability for the numerous abuses, lies, and illegalities of the past two years. Should they get a pass and escape accountability for what they did to America? And we will each have a “one more thing” story to discuss!

0 COMMENTS


Frontiers of Freedom’s Weekly Report – Oct. 28, 2022

with George Landrith, Dr. Larry Fedewa, Tom Donelson, and Dr. Joe Mangiacotti

       

     

Frontiers of Freedom Weekly Report – October 28, 2022

George Landrith, Dr. Joe Mangiacotti, Tom Donelson, and Dr. Larry Fedewa discuss the leading issues of the week: The debates and how they went and why the Democrats are reluctant to debate or wanted only one and wanted it very late in the process. What the Fetterman and Dr. debate meant. Extremist Gov. Hochul vs. Rep. Zeldin debate. Extremist Gov. Whitmer vs. Tudor Dixon. And Extremist Tina Kotek vs. Christine Drazan. Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter and what it means for free speech and free and robust debate of ideas. Joe Biden’s bad habit of lying about everything from the price of gasoline, inflation, the state of the economy and the border, just to name a few. Why does he lie? And why doesn’t the media seem to care? Chuck Schumer admits that Hershel Walker is beating Warnock in Georgia! The price of freedom is eternal vigilance – so stay vigilant my friends!

      

HERE’S THE LINK —-> https://rumble.com/v1qdrdq-frontiers-of-freedom-weekly-report-october-28-2022.html


RISING RED WAVE

BLUMENTHAL AND SCHUMER NEW TARGETS OF ‘LIBERAL EXTREMIST” TV SPOT NOW IN 5 STATES

        

CONNECTICUT SENATE SEAT SUDDENLY IN PLAY

TV spot that recently shook up Arizona and New Hampshire races now on nightly broadcast news in Hartford.

HITS BLUMENTHAL:

THE MOST DANGEROUS PLACE IN WASHINGTON AND CONNECTICUT IS STANDING BETWEEN BLUMENTHAL AND A TV CAMERA”

“COMPLETELY FABRICATED STORY ABOUT MILITARY SERVICE IN VIETNAM.  INSULT TO VETERANS.”

“Too Extreme for Connecticut” 

BLUMENTHAL’S “CORRUPT BARGAIN WITH LEFT WING EXTREMISTS” MADE HIM VOTE THEIR AGENDA IN ORDER TO AVOID PRIMARY CHALLENGE.

“KEY ENABLER” WHO VOTED 98% WITH BIDEN.   

FOCUS is on Connecticut but

Also anti-Schumer version on nightly news in upstate cities of Rochester, Buffalo and Syracuse

 Along with first buy in Nevada against endangered Democrat Cortez Masto

And new buy in Arizona against Mark Kelly

As well as New Hampshire ads against Maggie Hassan. 5 total states.

BLUMENTHAL IS VULNERABLE — Citing recent polling PAC chairman says:

“In Connecticut the polling has shown Blumenthal with weak support and his opponent Leora Levy pulled quite close in a recent Fabrizio poll and has momentum.  She is an excellent candidate with very impressive educational and professional credentials but, most of all, she is an outspoken critic of Blumenthal’s leftist swing.” Frontiers of Freedom PAC President George Landrith.

“Republicans must expand the map and go for a big win in the Senate—people in Connecticut and New York are disgusted with Blumenthal and Schumer as symbols  of a Democratic Party taken over by  left wing extremists.” George Landrith

TV SPOT: 

Richard Blumental made a corrupt bargain with left-wing extremists to not run a primary against him if he pushed far-left positions

  “Why did he let her fear of a primary make him cave into the left-wing extremist “squad’? (Screen shows CORRUPT BARGAIN WITH LEFT WING EXTREMISTS” emblazoned across photo of radical-left New York Representative Ocasio-Cortez and 3 other far- left members of “THE SQUAD” in Democrat House of Representatives)

  “How can he say he isn’t a left-wing extremist if every time he votes like one?

 VOTED AGAINST CONSTITUENTS 

  “Why did Richard Blumental go to the big city and forget the people who sent her there.”

TV SPOT ASKS  CONNECTICUT MEDIA TO END ‘FREE RIDE” FROM “CORRUPT NATIONAL MEDIA” FOR ITS “CHOSEN CANDIDATE” WHICH MEANT HE NEVER HAD TO DENOUNCE EXTREMISTS  WHO WANT TO “ DEFUND THE POLICE” OR THE Democrat’s “dark money alliance with notorious anti-American billionaire George Soros and lawless prosecutors” to  the “destruction of women’s sports” and childhood education with “gender lunacy.”

2 MINUTE TV SPOT WON PLAUDITS “AS THE GREATEST CAMPAIGN AD EVERY MADE” AND “EVERY MAGA SHOULD IMITIATE THIS FORMAT” WHEN FIRST RELEASED IN AUGUST AGAINST SCHUMER.  

UNIQUE NARRTIVE 2 minute ad takes its first minute to call national media  “the most powerful and corrupt institutions in America” seeking to protect their own “chosen candidates,” ask voters to “send a message to the media bosses” and then cites the media for covering up 1)  China virus leak, 2) Hunter Biden laptop scandal, 3) illegal wrongdoing by Clinton and Biden, 4) FBI harassment of political dissenters  5)never apologized for two years of its Russian collusion hoax,  6)promoted  smears and civil rights violations against conservatives, 7)phony impeachments and show trials.8)covered up Biden’s ill health and incompetence by letting him run from basement.

AD ALSO CITES SENATE DEMOCRATS FOR

       HUGE SPENDING BILLS CAUSING SHATTERING INFLATION AND RECESSION.

       SHUT DOWN PIPELINES, DROVE UP GAS PRICES

       CAUSED FOOD SHORTAGES EVEN BABY FORMULA

       AND OPPOSING SCHOOL REFORM.

DESTROY WOMEN’S SPORTS AND CHILDHOOD EDUCATION WITH GENDER LUNACY (Pix of Lia the swimmer and drag queens at kindergarten)

AD HITS SENATE DEMS FOR “SCORCHED-EARTH” “RULE-OR -RUIN” ATTACK ON AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS

WILL DESTROY –

THE SUPREME COURT

THE SACRED SECRET BALLOT    (No voter ID, unlimited vote harvesting and mail-ins) & (DC bureaucrats’ takeover of elections)

 CITIZENSHIP    (Open borders)

US SENATE    (Add new states, no filibuster)

ELECTORAL COLLEGE   (Elections decided by a few counties in a few states)

IMPOSE ANTI-CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS TEST FOR FEDERAL OFFICE


On The Road To An Agonizing Decline: The 20th Pageantry of the Chinese Communist Party

Dr. Miklos K. Radvanyi

The conclusion of the just ended 20th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party is that on July 23, 1921 established organization has irreversibly outlived its usefulness.  The central proof of this statement is President Xi Jinping’s report that was abound with all the old banalities of previous speeches delivered in blatant disregard for existing realities.  Accordingly, heaping only praises on his questionable achievements, while concealing the abysmal condition of the Chinese economy, the rising discontent of the people with the tyrannical actions of the authorities, the manifest hopelessness of the future for the young and the middle-aged, President Xi indirectly acknowledged the deepening chasm between the Party and the state, as well as the yawning gap between the privileged Party bureaucracy and the people.  In view of all these challenges, his fundamental question should have been how to assure the stability and future growth of his antediluvian tyranny.  His answer that he gave in his report was to obey the Party with one’s heart and mind by practicing blind loyalty to him personally.  In arriving at such an exalted rank, one only needs to study his thoughts and Chinese history pursuant to his interpretation, in order to accept and adore everything in tyrannical China.  

Thus, President Xi at the ripe age of 69, reached the state of Shakespeare’s aging King Lear who wanted nothing but to be loved by his three daughters.  Comparably, President Xi’ s chief concern is his colleagues and his subjects’ lack of sufficient appreciation.  Following a barrage of words, such as “security,” “military readiness,” “struggle,” “high winds,” “choppy waters,” “dangerous storms,” he never mentioned political reforms.  His solution for the mounting domestic and international challenges is “self-reform,” which entails firm ideological adherence and unconditional loyalty to himself.  Clearly, President Xi is full of himself.  For this reason alone, people across the globe cannot trust him.  

For the United States of America, the European Union and the rest of the world it is time to sober up and be extremely pessimistic about the future of the People’s Republic of China, both internally as well as externally.  During his decade long tenure, President Xi’s economic policies oscillated between sheer incompetence, sticking to badly thought out half-baked ideas, and politically driven compromises.  While initially he encouraged reformers to tinker with free market ideas, following the emergence of COVID-19 epidemic, he panicked and rushed head on to push incoherent and antithetical economic designs.  The crackdown on nongovernmental conglomerates, successful technology firms, banks, real estate firms, etc., was exacerbated by politically motivated promotion of the meaningless slogan of “common prosperity,” the “vision of national greatness,” and the intensification of relentless anti-corruption campaigns.  

Domestically, the dumbing down of the Chinese people reached a new peak.  President Xi’s untiring exhortations to fill the contents of books, movies, theater pieces with “positive energy” and “Chinese Socialist Characteristics,” made Chinese literature as well as the media a laughingstock of Asia.  A typical example of such intellectual garbage is the story of a north-eastern transfer student by the name of Wang Hu of the city of Shenyang.  Mixing with students from Hong-Kong, Macau, Taiwan and even Thailand, Wang Hu has to fight the deviant ideas of his fellow students until they become convinced that the right path to follow is President Xi’s thoughts about the inevitable superiority of the Han race.  In addition to resurrecting the ever present Chinese racism, the “North-Eastern Transfer Student” patriotic saga also declares that everything President Xi determines is indisputable “Chinese territory.”

President Xi’s fantasy of race-based isolationist pan-Chinese unity is present in his foreign policy approach.  His foreign policy speeches, including his report to the Party Congress, reveal a bumbling tactician of imperial power designs.  His repeated criticism of “American hegemony” and Western interference in his country’s illegal expansion in the Pacific and elsewhere, present a man who is not a strategist and a statesman.  Aspiring to legitimize his claim to Chinese world hegemony, he misuses the past to project China’s global future, while enveloping the uncertainties of the present into the foggy ideas of false realities, elaborate deceptions and outright lies.  

In this context, the danger is real.  Internationally, President Xi displays the same character flaws that he demonstrates in his domestic dealings with his unfortunate Chinese subjects.  The 20th Chinese Communist Party Congress is by no means merely a Chinese affair.  The world in general must be made aware of the historical barbarism of Chinese culture.  Unquestionably, President Xi has declared war on his colleagues and the entire Chinese people.  Equally, he has stated his intention to challenge, if needed militarily, the status quo throughout the world.  For all these, he must be confronted decisively.  Therefore, viewing from this perspective, his triumphant report is more a downbeat oratory than a constructive political map for the People’s Republic of China.  The world will have to deal with this Chinese tyrant for the next five years whose ambitions have always exceeded his and his country’s real potential.  


The Tyrannical Gravediggers Of Russia and China

By Dr. Miklos K. Radvanyi • Newslooks.com

For the casual observer, tyrants like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping appear to be possessed with irresistible superpower qualities. In reality, they are constantly overwhelmed by cataclysmic fears, bordering on paralyzing cowardice. The main reason for this sociopathological condition is that they are all irresponsible and unconscionable liars. Yet, more importantly, they do not just lie to others. They also lie to themselves. Consequently, nations that are ruled by these and like minded tyrants will sooner rather than later be irreversibly corrupted to their core and at the end lose their countries. Accordingly, these two political scumbags are constantly lying, smearing and threatening everybody inside and outside their reach with the most unimaginable consequences, if the subjects do not reconcile themselves to their corrupting ideologies.

The goal always is to forge a preconceived notion of those who dare think differently and declare those people the eternal enemies of the tyrants. This capricious division between their subjects, more precisely their dumbed down useful idiots, and their enemies, who exist in the real world and not in the tyrants’ imaginary universe, places the moral onus on the so-called enemies to justify their adherence to reality vis-a-vis the misguided abnormal people who exist in an amoral pseudo reality.

Thus, Putin has been masquerading as an anti-Khrushchev, anti-Brezhnev, anti-Gorbachev as well as anti-Yeltsin statesman, who is permanently ready to take upon the decadent United States of America and its allies, in order to defend the morally pure and victimized Russian people, in which the “organic model” of Russian statehood includes all the arbitrarily defined Slavic peoples. In a principled and law-abiding world, Putin’s resurrection of the schizophrenic thinkers Iwan Alexandrovich Ilyin and Alexandr Gelyevich Dugin’s imperialist ideologies are extremely dangerous, because they signal Ivan the Terrible and Josef Stalin’s battle cry for the final solution of the epochal struggle between the arch-enemy West and the Russian World. In such a context, understanding the Putin phenomenon is essential to the global order across the world. His modus operandi, namely, “if my enemies do not do what I want, I shall annihilate them,” is nothing but the total disregard as well as blatant usurpation of all international principles for the naked antediluvian Russian colonial/imperialist interests.

Almost in unison with his failing colleague in the north, Xi Jinping has espoused the same sham reality in his dealings with the rest of the world. Like his predecessor Mao Tsetung, he declared tyrannically that L’etat c’est moi. Equally, like Louis XIV, he firmly believes that he owns, lock stock and barrel, the People’s Republic of China. Yet, the 1.4 billion Chinese are not his property. Equating himself with his country, does not make him a leader – it places him in the capricious position of a usurper of the people’s will. His bid for an unprecedented third term and the revitalization of Mao’s title “General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party,” merely conceals the fact that behind the image of seeming political tranquility and material prosperity lurk the weaknesses of his self-generated personality cult, which are based on the crumbling foundations of a dishonest ideology. His “Socialism with Chinese Characteristics” is a phantom that possesses no lasting qualities. His illegitimate expansion in the Pacific Ocean and his preposterous claim to the Republic of China, if he would attempt to enforce it, will surely succumb to the same humiliation as Putin’s unlawful and predatory invasion of Ukraine.

Meanwhile, the Russian tyrant just celebrated his nonexistent victory in Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia and Kherson amid a very successful Ukrainian counteroffensive to recapture the territories that President Putin recently annexed to the Russian Federation. Adding insult to injury, protests against the not so partial, in actuality general mobilization are growing and the economy is writhing in its death pangs. Moreover, both western alliances and many non allied nations are vying with each other to express their absolute rejection of Russia’s annexation by declaring that President Putin has already made himself the laughingstock of the world. Today, the catalog of problems facing this Russian liar is so extensive that it is no wonder that he is threatening the world with nuclear armageddon.

To his south, President Xi also wants to destroy the world in the firm belief that he would accomplish its liberation from the rotten United States of America’s lasting hegemony. He hopes that when the present order of the world collapses, the nascent chaos would annihilate all states with the exception of his terrifying People’s Republic of China. However, a Russian cum Chinese world would preserve ubiquitous tyranny in its most deadly form.

For these reasons alone, the international community shall not be alarmed and exasperated by the travails of Russian cum Chinese aggression and wonder whether it would be better to compromise, or even give in to these two lying tyrants. Thus, it is incumbent upon the international community to remain united and make the international legal principle a living reality, according to which illegally occupying territories of independent states does not establish the aggressors’ sovereignty over them. Concomitantly, real and permanent international peace and stability can only prevail in a world, in which the right of every legitimate state is unconditionally recognized to live in freedom from any claims that might alone make right.


The Russian Prisoner Of War

By Dr. Miklos K. Radvanyi •

Today again, for a multitude of global and local reasons, the entire world appears to be in a state of permanent revolt against sanity.  Concurrently, all of the most substantial horrors of history have been caused by the violent prosecution of untruthful or even fallacious realities.  However, these unreal, improbable and cult-like political, economic, cultural as well as social concoctions have always been capable of destroying themselves when they have reached a point of no return.  Most importantly, peace and stability in the world could only have been accomplished by states that have been governed by lawfully elected governments not subject to dictatorship, autocracy, or tyranny.  When individuals or a mass of people have accepted lies as truths and have decided to blindly follow megalomaniac demagogues with unbridled lust for power, they and the world at large have always been transformed into multiple mental asylums and genocidal cemeteries.  

Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, the tyrant de jour of the newly minted Russian Federation, who appears to be more a destroyer of a discombobulated and befuddled multi-ethnic state than its constructive architect, which is barely civilized and scarcely part of the European continent, has decided from the second decade of the 21th century to take a decisive role in European affairs and thus bolster his country’s fading significance across the globe.  Having been a born narcissist with a sick temperament, he convinced himself that he was already capable of creating a sufficient number of useful idiots inside and outside Russia to make them passive observers of his illegal annexation of the sovereign state of Ukraine.  Thus, like Adolf Hitler in 1938, Putin uses a racist argument under the guise of wanting to unite all Russians into “Mother Russia” for territorial expansion. Equally, as Hitler in 1938, he counted on Western appeasement, based on past historical circumstances and randomly selected personal factors.  Finally, invested with almost unlimited powers, he decided to exercise them simultaneously for overwhelming effects.  Consequently, his Blitzkrieg plan appeared to be a copious conception of World War II history, the strategic concept of a self declared military genius.  In reality, his so-called grand design has turned into a nightmare of humiliating political and military defeats.

Thus, what started on February 24, 2022, as relatively modest “special military operations” is now a fully fledged war between Russia and Ukraine.  To the tragic detriment of Russia, Putin, in his escalating mental frenzy, failed to study three important quotes relating to provoking, conducting and closing a war.  In 1916, in his posthumously published “The Mysterious Stranger,” Mark Twain opined:  “There has never been a just (war), never an honorable one – on the part of the instigator of the war.”  Justifying his unlawful invasion of Ukraine, he first cited NATO’s alleged expansionism, claiming the right of self-defense.  Then, accused Ukraine of committing relentless genocide against its Russian minority, and called for “denazification” of the country.  Attempting to further underpin the rightness of Russia’s large scale invasion, he reached back to the well-worn Soviet argument about the 10th century Kievan Rus as the joint foundation of Russia, Ukraine and Belorussia.  Yet, paradoxically, he pointed to Crimea as an exclusively Russian territory, which legally returned in 2014 to the “Russian Harbor” and the “Russian World” (Russkiy Mir).  Lastly, Putin turned his attention to the Roman Shukhevich and Stepan Bandera led war of liberation against the Soviet Union and the 2014 Maidan revolution.  Claiming that Viktor Yanukovich, the rightful president, was deposed by a neo-Nazi coup d’etat, inspired by the ideology of Shekhevich and Bandera, he maquaraded as the Stalin-like liberator of Ukraine, Europe and, ultimately, the world.

The second wisdom about war that Putin ignored was defined by Sun Tzu’s “Art of War”:  “If you know the enemy and yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.  If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat.  If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”  Secluded in his ivory tower in the Kremlin, Putin has had no actual knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of his military.  On the other hand, he woefully underestimated Ukrainian nationalism and the almost universal resolve of the Ukrainian people to remain an independent nation.  Moreover, he misjudged the European Union’s determination to unite against his lying narrative about his unlawful invasion of a member state of the United Nations.  Finally, he did not count on the unanimous diplomatic rejection of his illegal military adventure across the globe.

Thirdly, he did not pay attention to H.G. Wells’s sage words:  “If we don’t end war, war will end us.”  Unwisely, Putin still does not have a plan B or C on how to end his lawless invasion.  President Putin is in a deep state of a quandary.  It is politically impossible for him to return to the status quo ante without losing power, yet there are great dangers in the miseries he has inflicted on Russia, Ukraine, Europe and beyond.

The world is passing through a dangerous crisis.  It has been put in this untenable position by a reckless and unconscionable gambler.  The world should not be afraid of calling President Putin’s bluff.  The alternative is more of the same from the current Russian tyrant.  Under such circumstances, hatred and falsified rules and principles would surely lead to chaos and the ultimate destruction of the human existence on earth.    


WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com